[FROM ISG] Mythbusting: Your LifeStraw isn’t good enough.

This article (written by Aaron YR) originally appeared on Integrated Skills Group. A very thoughtful group of guys over there producing intelligent, non-tacticool training, videos, and writing. -Jordan, AKA SkinnyJeanTactical


If you patrol through the comments of any disaster preparedness forums, blogs, or social media groups, you’ll quickly be assailed with the following wisdom any time you recommend a good water filter:

“Get a lifestraw, they’re $20.”

These good people will talk you to death about their guns and how they’ll survive out of their backpack once the EMP hits, but what they won’t do is regale you with stories about how they got pinworms, beaver fever, or diarrhea from drinking water through an insufficient filter.

This topic is going to get heavy handed quick and if you’re inclined to look at reason and evidence, it’ll leave you with no question as to the importance of a good water filter. If you’re not and you’re banking on a $20 budget device for a worst-case scenario, well, at least you’ll know the risks.

Sometimes your water looks like the one on the right…. buuuuut sometimes it looks like the left. During disasters, water sources are one of our first critical resources to go. Be ready.

Budget Preparation

We get that not everyone has the money to drop on an MSR Guardian, so please don’t mistake this as a jab at people on a budget. Our goal is to provide some evidence that you’re going to be miles ahead by saving and getting a quality filter (which can be had from $75-100) as it will last longer, perform it’s task more efficiently, and provide you more protection against what basically amounts to gut works, diarrhea, and liquid cancer.

There are places where you can skimp. We’ve tested dozens of knives and backpacks. We’ll gladly tell you that if all you can afford is a Kershaw and an surplus ALICE pack, you can put those to good use and not be all that far behind the guy with a Kifaru and custom made knife from whoever’s popular.

Often times, skill and mindset are enough to overcome deficiencies in equipment.

In the case of water filters, that’s not true.

Let’s start by defining the importance of water:

Water is a non-negotiable, consumable requirement, and it’s a vector for diseases – especially in emergencies.

Also, if you’ve already grabbed a Lifestraw or Sawyer filter, we’re not knocking you. Taking *some* step is better than nothing. But, you need to have a realistic assessment of what you can expect if you have to press it into serve in a post-Disaster environment. For this reason, if you laugh at a $100 water filter, but you’ve got a $1000 AR-15, now would be a good time to consider your priorities.

A last point on this: we say often that water is a non-negotiable, consumable requirement. What this means is “You can never carry enough”. Period.

What you *can* do is have a method of preparing water you come across to make it safe. As such, if you can carry enough for a day or two and plan around finding more, we can address the problem of infinite requirement by having the right tools…

So, bottom line up front:

If you buy a $20 filter, you’re going to get $20 worth of protection for a resource you’re going to need through the duration of the situation, that – if filtered poorly – will make you sick with one of the deadlier conditions known to mankind.

Water Science: Contaminants

Having briefly been a part of the nation’s leading water science agency, there are some major considerations that you need to understand when it comes to water safety. First of all, let’s break it into two categories: Physical safety, and Safe Consumption. We’re not going to talk about physical safety here (think: floods and boating, which are responsible for an astonishing number of deaths) but we’ll instead focus on drinking water.

United States Superfund Sites, Source: EPA

In particular, we want to be thinking about inorganic (Dissolved solids, heavy metals, chemical toxins) and organic contaminants. The CDC estimates that about 704,000 children are killed annually by diarrheal infections caused by poor quality water globally [1]. That’s 1,931 children every day, and yes, it’s mostly in ‘developing’ countries.

What we should make clear at this point is that there are places in the U.S. that are drinking water that have 3rd world standards of treatment. Flint Michigan is a recent, high profile example. Toxins in the groundwater found at Love Canal, NY caused widespread birth defects, miscarriages, and cancer in the late 1970’s [3].

One of the components of water science was working in and around Superfund sites, which were/are so toxic the government had to buy them up and attempt cleanup on a scale that transcends industrial… these places are so bad that the companies couldn’t just be sued and held accountable and they were causing health issues the wouldn’t just stop with time.

In most of these cases, ground and drinking water were affected.

We should only expect that this will get worse if we find ourselves in a state of emergency.

The second point to consider is the introduction of biological contaminants. We’ve covered this before in our article “Water in Emergencies“, so please reference it if you’re interested in more. The short version is this:

  • If you get sick, you require *more* clean water.
  • If you get sick with diarrhea, water will be required to sanitize the mess.
  • Such illnesses cripple your ability to move, which is essential in disasters.

The takeaway from this section is that water all across the U.S. has contaminants and it doesn’t matter if it’s groundwater or surface water. Additionally, it’s often impossible to tell if the water is contaminated. It can have a pronounced signature (rust colored deposition on vegetation, irregular color, etc) but it may not. Further, bacteria from decomposing animals are impossible to detect.

These problems are compounded by disasters, so plan accordingly.

Testing and Evaluation

Coffee made with the pump filter = good.
Coffee made with the Sawyer = mud.

First things first here: NO filter will give you an accurate estimate of it’s true capacity.

If it says it’s good for 1,500 liters, it’s talking about water in a laboratory. Start mixing in the things we mentioned above and they’ll clog fast, even very good ones. For this reason, one of our first considerations is “can I replace and/or service the filter?”

You might not get more than 500 liters if you’re pumping hard water in a post-Disaster Environment, so it’s better to play it safe, have a quality pump filter, and inspect and change your filter often.

One of the things we’ve found that doesn’t get any talk is if you’ve got family, how are your kids going to drink from that lifestraw? You want them hovering over a pool of muddy water and trying to drink from it while you hold them in place? What if you’ve got a small group with canteens/Nalgene bottles to fill? How well suited is your filter to that task?

Often enough, guys will say “well, even if it’s not the best, I can still boil the water”.

Do us a favor: Go look at the capacity on the filter bag. How fast can you get a 3L camel back filled? Do you carry a metal cup with which to boil the water? How long will that take at your locations elevation? Often as not, guys aren’t even carrying a cup to boil water in, so be honest with yourself.

To paraphrase our net takeaways:

  • Water, with purpose built filters, was easier to extract, as you could drop a hose into the water source, rather than have to hold your self over it.
  • It’s never good to touch your mouth to your filter, as oral bacteria are prolific and spread easily. You want to keep your drinking container and filter separate if possible.
  • Water was extracted more quickly and efficiently into larger reservoirs using pump type filters.
  • Water quality was evaluated by comparing mostly subjective analysis, but water extracted using pump filters tasted better and was more clear.
  • Water extracted from sources and left in containers from water filters had less incidences of bacterial growth after 2 weeks compared to straw type filters. We’re not including this as strong evidence, because it could be differences in containers (Camelback, Nalgene, Canteen, glass, etc all have different properties when it comes to fighting bacterial growth).

When we discuss having the right tools, we need to look at whether or not those tools can keep us afloat while we move, not just can they get us a drink while we’re at our water source.

During side by side testing, we found that the lifestraw/Sawyer type filters were less effective at filtering out bad odor and flavor, drew water at a slower rate, were insufficient for gathering water for a small group, and were not end-user serviceable. While we lacked a laboratory to verify the exact effectiveness of each filter, there was a clear, consistent advantage to purpose built backpack filters that were pump designs in their efficiency in drawing water, service, and bacterial growth in containers.

Further, while Lifestraw filters often featured reservoirs, those reservoirs were intended to be filled with potentially contaminated water.

In our view, pumping the water into a cup or pot that can then be boiled before adding it to your water storage gives the best overall results.


Water isn’t something you want to mess with. Not only is contaminated water full of both biological diseases and carcinogens, but you’ll always need clean water. We’ve discussed layering your plan in such a way that you’re able to make a primitive filter, and we encourage water treatment in home using filters.

Our goal isn’t to play with fantasy setups like “I’m never coming home bags”. It’s to sustain deliberate activity and as such, water is a critical element in staying deliberate. Without it, you’ll choke, sputter, and die. If you drink bad water, you’ll not only require *more* clean water to recover, but you’re likely to contract a bacterial or parasitic infection (especially in tropical regions).

Our short story conclusion:

Straw type water filters aren’t good enough. Don’t bet your life on them.




[1] https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/global/wash_statistics.html

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_water_crisis

[3] https://archive.epa.gov/epa/aboutepa/love-canal-tragedy.html

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_Creek_Superfund_site

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s